Status: Proposal

Law - Mexico - The General Law of Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Due Diligence

The General Law of Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Due Diligence

Summary Table

Obligations
  • Reporting
  • Due Diligence
Normative scope
  • Human Rights
  • Environment
Value chain scope
  • Own operations
  • Subsidiaries
  • Direct Suppliers
  • Indirect Suppliers
Company scope
  • Large Companies
  • SMEs
  • All sectors
Administrative enforcement
  • Monitoring
  • Administrative Sanctions
Judicial enforcement
  • Other
  • Facilitating Access to Justice
  • Civil Liability
Obligations
  • Reporting
    • The Act requires an annual report from applicable companies.
  • Due Diligence
    • The Act would make it an obligation for companies to permanently implement a corporate social responsibility program and, in turn, an obligation for the authority to duly audit its suppliers on human rights issues.
    • The Act applies to micro, small and medium-sized companies but only requires that they have their accounting records up to date, and include a human rights protection clause in their bylaws. It does not require them to implement due diligence measures.
Normative scope
  • Human Rights
    • The Act addresses labour abuses through a human rights perspective: exploitation of workers, inhuman treatment and wages, child labor, forced labor, but also informality, unemployment, gender gap, low wages.
  • Environment
    • The Act addresses resource exploitation, pollution and deforestation.
Value chain scope
  • Own operations
  • Subsidiaries
  • Direct Suppliers
  • Indirect Suppliers
Company scope
  • Large Companies
  • SMEs
  • All sectors
    • The Act applies to entities belonging to the textile, mining, energy, tourism and agri-food industries.
Administrative enforcement
  • Monitoring
    • The Ministry of the Economy is tasked with monitoring compliance with this Act. However, the bill does not set out the process or frequency of this monitoring.
  • Administrative Sanctions
    • The sanctions may include: public or private reprimand; financial penalty or fine; suspension of company activities; closure of their premises; prohibition of carrying out activities in the future; temporary decertification; judicial intervention; or dissolution of the company.
    • The sanctions may be reduced by up to a third if, prior to the alleged act, there was a permanent control body in charge of verifying compliance with the Act.
    • If, prior to the human rights violation, the company has a complete corporate social responsibility program and a due diligence control body, the corresponding sanctions may be waived or reduced.
Judicial enforcement
  • Other
    • Criminal liability: Companies found in violation may be legally pursued by the state under this Act. However, this does not preclude civil action from communities or other actors.
    • State non-judicial mechanisms: The Act includes state non-judicial mechanisms, such as mediation.
    • State consequences: If a company is found to be causing harm, it may present evidence that demonstrates that the State did not exercise its powers of supervision, or validated acts that constituted a violation of human rights, the State will be responsible for omission of the violation and the company can take legal action against the responsible authorities.
  • Facilitating Access to Justice
  • Civil Liability
Law

Ley General de Responsabilidad Empresarial y Debida Diligencia Corporativa

Mexico
Area Administrative Law
Reporting
Due diligence
Due diligence and remedy